RENORT: a project to analyze patterns of care in radiation oncology in Spain

PurposeRENORT is an application (app) developed to assess the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer using the oncology information systems (OIS).Methods/PatientsThe RENORT app was used to analyze the data for all patients seen and/or treated at six radiation oncology departments in Spain in 2019. This app can be used to extract the demographic data, treatment sequence, disease status, and radiotherapy treatments from the ARIA and Mosaiq OIS.ResultsA total of 6564 treatments were performed at these six centers in 2019. Most patients (56.9%) were males (females 43.1%). The mean patient age was 64.9 years. The most common treatment types and sites were as follows: metastases/palliative care (25.9%), followed by breast (19.0%), genitourinary (13.7%), lung (10.1%), head and neck (6.0%), rectal (6.0%), gynecological (4.9%), and other (< 4%) cancers. Distribution by disease stage was as follows: breast cancer: 75.5% early stage (stages 0, I, and II); lung: 63.1% advanced stage (III and IV); and head and neck: 72.1% advanced. Treatment intent was curative in 76.5% of cases and palliative in 23.5%. The most common techniques were intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) (41.4%), followed by three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) (39.2%); stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) (8.1%); brachytherapy (5.5%); radiosurgery (2.1%); fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy to the brain (1.4%); and intraoperative radiotherapy (1.4%). Hypofractionation was used in 62.3% of curative treatments (mean number of fractions = 16.5).ConclusionsRENORT is a free app that is available for the two main oncology information systems used in most radiation oncology departments. This app has demonstrated the capacity to extract data from these systems, which in turns allows for a comprehensive analysis and better understanding of the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer.

RENORT: a project to analyze patterns of care in radiation oncology in Spain.

PURPOSE: RENORT is an application (app) developed to assess the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer using the oncology information systems (OIS). METHODS/PATIENTS: The RENORT app was used to analyze the data for all patients seen and/or treated at six radiation oncology departments in Spain in 2019. This app can be used to extract the demographic data, treatment sequence, disease status, and radiotherapy treatments from the ARIA and Mosaiq OIS. RESULTS: A total of 6564 treatments were performed at these six centers in 2019. Most patients (56.9%) were males (females 43.1%). The mean patient age was 64.9 years. The most common treatment types and sites were as follows: metastases/palliative care (25.9%), followed by breast (19.0%), genitourinary (13.7%), lung (10.1%), head and neck (6.0%), rectal (6.0%), gynecological (4.9%), and other (< 4%) cancers. Distribution by disease stage was as follows: breast cancer: 75.5% early stage (stages 0, I, and II); lung: 63.1% advanced stage (III and IV); and head and neck: 72.1% advanced. Treatment intent was curative in 76.5% of cases and palliative in 23.5%. The most common techniques were intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) (41.4%), followed by three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) (39.2%); stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) (8.1%); brachytherapy (5.5%); radiosurgery (2.1%); fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy to the brain (1.4%); and intraoperative radiotherapy (1.4%). Hypofractionation was used in 62.3% of curative treatments (mean number of fractions = 16.5). CONCLUSIONS: RENORT is a free app that is available for the two main oncology information systems used in most radiation oncology departments. This app has demonstrated the capacity to extract data from these systems, which in turns allows for a comprehensive analysis and better understanding of the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer.

Demand for radiotherapy in Spain

Aim. Assessing the demand for radiotherapy in Spain based on existing evidence to estimate the human resources and equipment needed so that every person in Spain has access to high-quality radiotherapy when they need it. Material and methods. We used data from the European Cancer Observatory on the estimated incidence of cancer in Spain in 2012, along with the evidence-based indications for radiotherapy developed by the Australian CCORE project, to obtain an optimal radiotherapy utilisation proportion (OUP) for each tumour. Results. About 50.5 % of new cancers in Spain require radiotherapy at least once over the course of the disease. Additional demand for these services comes from reradiation therapy and non-melanoma skin cancer. Approximately, 25-30 % of cancer patients with an indication for radiotherapy do not receive it due to factors that include access, patient preference, familiarity with the treatment among physicians, and especially resource shortages, all of which contribute to its underutilisation. Conclusions. Radiotherapy is underused in Spain. The increasing incidence of cancer expected over the next decade and the greater frequency of reradiations necessitate the incorporation of radiotherapy demand into need-based calculations for cancer services planning (AU)

No disponible

Demand for radiotherapy in Spain.

AIM: Assessing the demand for radiotherapy in Spain based on existing evidence to estimate the human resources and equipment needed so that every person in Spain has access to high-quality radiotherapy when they need it. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used data from the European Cancer Observatory on the estimated incidence of cancer in Spain in 2012, along with the evidence-based indications for radiotherapy developed by the Australian CCORE project, to obtain an optimal radiotherapy utilisation proportion (OUP) for each tumour. RESULTS: About 50.5 % of new cancers in Spain require radiotherapy at least once over the course of the disease. Additional demand for these services comes from reradiation therapy and non-melanoma skin cancer. Approximately, 25-30 % of cancer patients with an indication for radiotherapy do not receive it due to factors that include access, patient preference, familiarity with the treatment among physicians, and especially resource shortages, all of which contribute to its underutilisation. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy is underused in Spain. The increasing incidence of cancer expected over the next decade and the greater frequency of reradiations necessitate the incorporation of radiotherapy demand into need-based calculations for cancer services planning.

Lung metastases in oligometastatic patients: outcome with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

Purpose. To assess the clinical results in terms of local control, toxicity, failure pattern and toxicity of SBRT in oligometastatic patients with inoperable lung metastases. Methods. Forty-four patients were treated (53 metastases). Dose regimen: 5 × 12 Gy (66 %), 8 × 7.5 Gy (20.8 %) and 10 × 5 Gy (13.2 %). Response was assessed using PET/CT at 6 months after SBRT. Results. Local control at 1 and 2 years was 86.7 %. Seventy-five percent of local failures had received a BED <105 Gy. After a median follow-up of 13.3 months, 25 % experienced distant progression. Overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 86.7 and 60.4 %, and cancer-specific survival was 95.3 and 75.2 %, respectively. Grade 2 toxicity was 6.8 %. There was no grade 3–4 toxicity. Conclusion. SBRT is effective and safe. The main failure pattern is distant progression. The selection of patients with a high probability of remaining oligometastatic is crucial for the efficiency of SBRT, both clinically and in terms of resources (AU)

No disponible

Lung metastases in oligometastatic patients: outcome with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical results in terms of local control, toxicity, failure pattern and toxicity of SBRT in oligometastatic patients with inoperable lung metastases. METHODS: Forty-four patients were treated (53 metastases). Dose regimen: 5 × 12 Gy (66 %), 8 × 7.5 Gy (20.8 %) and 10 × 5 Gy (13.2 %). Response was assessed using PET/CT at 6 months after SBRT. RESULTS: Local control at 1 and 2 years was 86.7 %. Seventy-five percent of local failures had received a BED <105 Gy. After a median follow-up of 13.3 months, 25 % experienced distant progression. Overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 86.7 and 60.4 %, and cancer-specific survival was 95.3 and 75.2 %, respectively. Grade 2 toxicity was 6.8 %. There was no grade 3-4 toxicity. CONCLUSION: SBRT is effective and safe. The main failure pattern is distant progression. The selection of patients with a high probability of remaining oligometastatic is crucial for the efficiency of SBRT, both clinically and in terms of resources.

Radiotherapy in rectal cancer: development, adequacy and radiotherapy utilisation rate. A comparative analysis with the most frequent tumour sites

INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy is a basic weapon in the local treatment of multiple solid tumors. The radiotherapy activity has been evaluated in our centre during the past eleven years. The study focused on rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a descriptive study of all radiotherapy procedures performed between January 1998 and December 2008. It quantifies the workload of each pathology treated, the rate of irradiation and its adequacy with optimal rates of irradiation according to the best available scientific evidence. RESULTS: We quantified 9,622 external radiotherapy procedures of which 6,009 were associated with the five pathologies that involved the highest workloads. Of these, 905 were performed in rectal cancer. The workloads due to cancers of the breast, prostate, lung, gynaecological pathologies and rectal cancers were 23.2%, 11.8%, 11.6%, 6.3% and 9.3% respectively. The real "radiotherapy utilisation rates" of these pathologies were 62%, 20.2%, 34.3%, 21% and 64% respectively, while the "rates of adequacy" were 74.7%, 33.6%, 45.1%, 60% and 104.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The "radiotherapy utilisation rate" for rectal cancer was equivalent to the estimated optimum rate as defined on the basis of reference groups. The therapy utilised developed chronologically in parallel with the available scientific evidence. The radiotherapy utilisation rates for breast and prostate cancer gradually increased, with a tendency to reach optimal rates. Radiotherapy as a treatment for lung cancer was underutilised. In global terms, the rate of utilisation of radiation therapy was low, although it displayed a tendency to increase (AU)

Radiation oncology: future needs and equipment. Current situation in Spain

Spain's radiation oncology infrastructure has evolved in terms of both quantity and structure since the last analysis was carried out in 1999. The purpose of this paper is to describe the current facilities, basically consisting of external radiotherapeutic units, and to present a calculation model for estimating the number of irradiation units required to guarantee equitable cover for radiotherapeutic treatment. An electronic questionnaire was designed to be accessed via a link on the Spanish Association of Radiotherapy and Oncology Web page. The questionnaire provides details of the current state of Spain's radiotherapeutic facilities, and a descriptive study has been performed with analytical data. The scope of the study included all the centres providing oncology-radiotherapy in Spain. The units analysed encompassed the centres and irradiation units actively providing care in 2004. Ninety-seven centres were detected, in which 177 external radiotherapy units were registered. Forty-five of these were cobalt units and 132 were accelerators. The rate of radiotherapy use in Spain based on the best scientific evidence available and on its rate of use with cancer has been estimated at 61%. The number of external irradiation units available in 2004 (177) is clearly lower than the number desirable (266-316) (AU)

No disponible

Phase II trial: concurrent radio-chemotherapy with weekly docetaxel for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck.

INTRODUCTION: Standard fractionation radiation therapy (RT) combined with concomitant chemotherapy (CT) based on cisplatin schemes is actually the standard treatment for locally advanced non-resectable squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN). The appearance of taxoids has introduced a new kind of treatment with high antitumoral power. The aim of this study is to add more information about the role of this new approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with locally advanced non-resectable SCCHN were recruited at six institutions in Spain, between January 2001 and January 2003. Docetaxel was administered weekly, for 6 weeks, concurrently with RT. RESULTS: The mean total delivered dose of RT was 70'2 Gy (range 64-74 Gy). The median and mean duration of time were 63 days and 61 days (range 49-103 days) respectively. After a median time control of 19 months (range 3.3-42.2 months), the response rate was 83.4%. The median time to local progression was 16.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=4.4-28.4 months). The median survival time was 26.9 months, with one- and two-year overall survival of 66.9% (95% CI=48.1-85.7%) and 57.5% (95% CI=37.3-77.7%) respectively. The median duration time response was 15.1 months (95% CI=3.7-26.5 months). The median time until treatment failure was 9.4 months (95% CI=4.7-14.1). Incidence of grade III-IV mucositis was 88%, neutropenia 72% and skin toxicity 92% (24% grade III-IV). The incidence of severe late toxicity (grade III and IV) due to RT/CT was 31.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Although therapeutics results are equivalent to cisplatin schemes of concurrent CT-RT, mucositis and cutaneous toxicity registered in this trial must be considered as limiting factors to application of this new approach.

Phase II trial: concurrent radio-chemotherapy with weekly docetaxel for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck

INTRODUCTION: Standard fractionation radiation therapy (RT) combined with concomitant chemotherapy (CT) based on cisplatin schemes is actually the standard treatment for locally advanced non-resectable squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN). The appearance of taxoids has introduced a new kind of treatment with high antitumoral power. The aim of this study is to add more information about the role of this new approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with locally advanced non-resectable SCCHN were recruited at six institutions in Spain, between January 2001 and January 2003. Docetaxel was administered weekly, for 6 weeks, concurrently with RT. RESULTS: The mean total delivered dose of RT was 70'2 Gy (range 64-74 Gy). The median and mean duration of time were 63 days and 61 days (range 49-103 days) respectively. After a median time control of 19 months (range 3.3-42.2 months), the response rate was 83.4%. The median time to local progression was 16.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=4.4-28.4 months). The median survival time was 26.9 months, with one- and two-year overall survival of 66.9% (95% CI=48.1-85.7%) and 57.5% (95% CI=37.3-77.7%) respectively. The median duration time response was 15.1 months (95% CI=3.7-26.5 months). The median time until treatment failure was 9.4 months (95% CI=4.7-14.1). Incidence of grade III-IV mucositis was 88%, neutropenia 72% and skin toxicity 92% (24% grade III-IV). The incidence of severe late toxicity (grade III and IV) due to RT/CT was 31.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Although therapeutics results are equivalent to cisplatin schemes of concurrent CT-RT, mucositis and cutaneous toxicity registered in this trial must be considered as limiting factors to application of this new approach (AU)

Equipamiento y perspectivas de futuro de la Radioterapia Oncológica. Situación española / Equipment and Outlook for Radiotherapy Oncology. The situation in Spain

Durante la última década la radioterapia ha presentado un desarrollo tecnológico y radiobiológico exponencial. La aplicación clínica del avance en conocimientos biológicos es todavía escasa pero se augura un gran potencial de mejora en resultados terapéuticos. La evolución tecnológica está consiguiendo optimizar la distribución de la dosis en los volúmenes irradiados y conseguir tratamientos menos tóxicos. Hasta la fecha se desconoce la exacta repercusión del mejor control local tumoral sobre la supervivencia de la enfermedad. El nivel de desarrollo tecnológico español era escaso en 1999. La dotación actual es sin duda superior en parte fruto de la evidente infradotación explicita en el inventario practicado por la Asociación Española de Radioterapia y Oncología en los años 1999-2000 y cuyos datos se resumen (AU)

The authors of this paper describe the advances Radiotherapy has brought to this country over the last decade. They discuss the technological developments which are allowing radiation volume dosing to be optimized, leading to less toxic treatment (AU)

Ameloblastomas maxilares: a propósito de un caso clínico y revisiónde la literatura / Maxillary ameloblastoma: about a clinical case and review of the literature

- Propósito: se revisan los datos epidemiológicos, clínicos, anatomopatológicos y los procedimientos diagnósticos y terapéuticos de los ameloblastomas maxilares.- Material y métodos: se presenta un caso de ameloblastoma de maxilar superior en una mujer de 36 años.- Resultados: se realizó tratamiento con radioterapia postoperatoria tras cirugía radical, dado que se trataba de una lesión extensa en una paciente joven. Tras un seguimiento de 5 años y medio la paciente se encuentra libre de enfermedad.- Conclusiones: se describe el comportamiento de este tumor así como su tratamiento (AU)